Recently, Peter Obi, the presidential candidate of the Labour Party, responded to a video showing a long convoy associated with Tinubu. In a tweet, Obi urged the President to lead by example and reduce the cost of governance. His tweet garnered significant attention, particularly due to his reference to Tinubu as ‘Mr. President’ and his criticism of Tinubu’s convoy. Critics quickly countered Obi’s remarks by highlighting his own campaign convoy, claiming that it was also extensive.
In response to the criticism directed at Peter Obi’s convoy, Nana Kazaure offered a different perspective. Kazaure emphasized that the composition of Obi’s convoy was distinct from Tinubu’s. She explained that the movement of the Labour Party received support from numerous individuals who contributed to the campaign. Many of these convoy vehicles, Kazaure asserted, were obtained through donations from supporters who were unable to be physically present but wanted to back the campaign.
In her own words:
“There were so many people that supported the movement of Labour Party. A lot of those convoy, I put it to you, those convoy came through donations, those who couldn’t be there physically but said they are going to support the campaign…”
She said that Tinubu’s convoy is taxpayers’ money.
Kazaure’s statement underscores the fact that the composition and purpose of Peter Obi’s convoy differed from Tinubu’s. She highlights the collaborative nature of the Labour Party’s movement, where supporters contributed vehicles to aid the campaign. This approach allowed individuals who could not be physically present to participate by offering their support through donations. Kazaure’s perspective aims to establish a distinction between the sources and intentions behind the two convoys, emphasizing the grassroots support for the Labour Party.
The contrasting viewpoints surrounding the convoys of Peter Obi and Tinubu have sparked a debate on the cost of governance in the country. While Obi’s initial tweet criticized the long convoy associated with Tinubu, the ensuing scrutiny of his own campaign convoy prompted a discussion on the financing and significance of such extensive motorcades. The conversation has raised questions about the role of public perception and accountability in shaping political campaigns, with individuals on both sides offering differing interpretations of the convoys’ implications.
Ultimately, the debate surrounding the convoys serves as a reminder of the ongoing discourse regarding the conduct of political leaders and the cost of governance. The public’s reaction to these convoys reflects a broader concern for responsible leadership and the efficient allocation of resources in Nigeria’s political landscape. As the conversation continues, it remains to be seen how politicians will respond to calls for reduced expenses and increased transparency in their campaigns and governance.
Watch the video
Ablegirl (
)
